antibodies against chd7 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)
Structured Review

Antibodies Against Chd7, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 66 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against chd7/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 66 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "CHARGE syndrome-associated CHD7 acts at ISL1-regulated enhancers to modulate second heart field gene expression"
Article Title: CHARGE syndrome-associated CHD7 acts at ISL1-regulated enhancers to modulate second heart field gene expression
Journal: Cardiovascular Research
doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvad059
Figure Legend Snippet: Direct targets of CHD7 in the CPM, identified by CUT&RUN. ( A ) PCA of in vivo control ‘SHF’ and ‘HEART’ samples compared with in vitro CM differentiation time points from Wamstad et al. based on RNA-seq data. ( B ) Read density heatmaps (+/−2 kb relative to the centre of CHD7 peaks) and density profiles of CUT&RUN-seq in 3 biological replicates. Orange, CHD7 antibody; blue, IgG antibody; grey, input. ( C ) Distribution of distances from CHD7 peaks to the nearest TSS. ( D ) GO biological processes enriched in genes associated with CHD7 peaks. Terms are ranked by P -value from the Fisher exact test, by Enrichr. ( E ) Venn diagram of DEGs in Chd7 cKO ‘SHF’ with CHD7 binding, and GO terms enriched in these genes ( F ). ( G ) DEGs in Chd7 cKO ‘HEART’ with CHD7 binding, and GO terms enriched ( H ). P -values of Venn diagram overlaps from hypergeometric test and P -values of GO analysis from Fisher exact test.
Techniques Used: In Vivo, Control, In Vitro, RNA Sequencing, Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Loss of Chd7 in CPM dysregulates the cardiogenic GRN. ( A ) Whole mount E9.5 embryo showing the regions micro-dissected for the ‘SHF’ and ‘HEART’ RNA-seq experiments. ( B–C ) MA plots showing global gene expression changes in ‘SHF’ ( B ) and ‘HEART’ ( C ) in Chd7 cKO embryos relative to controls. Significantly changed genes with FDR < 0.1 are highlighted in red (up-regulated) or blue (down-regulated). ( D ) GO enrichment and ( E ) Jensen disease analysis for the 222 genes down-regulated in Chd7 cKO compared to control ‘SHF’. ( F ) GO terms and ( G ) OMIM disease terms enriched in the 426 genes down-regulated in Chd7 cKO ‘HEART’. Terms are ranked by P -values from the Fisher exact test, by Enrichr. ( H–J ) Venn diagrams showing the overlap between DEGs in Chd7 cKO ‘SHF’ and ‘HEART’ samples ( H ), ‘HEART’ and E11.5 hearts ( I ), and between ‘HEART’ and E13.5 hearts ( J ). DEGs in E11.5 and E13.5 hearts were obtained from previously published data. P -values based on hypergeometric test.
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Gene Expression, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Loss of CHD7 in the Meps1 lineage leads to reduced expression of anterior SHF markers. Whole mount in situ HCR staining of control and Chd7 cKO ( Mesp1-Cre; Chd7 fl/fl ) embryos at E9–9.5 for Fgf10 ( A–B’’’ ), Isl1 ( C–D’’’ ) and Mef2c ( E–F’’’ ). Boxed regions in ( A ), ( B ), ( C ), ( D ), ( E ), ( F ) are shown in neighbouring panels. Confocal maximum projection of the entire embryo and selected lateral or medial z-stacks are displayed. n = 4. See , for selected stacks highlighting domain differences. Arrowheads indicate cells in branchial arches; green bracket shows the SHF region. Scale bars represent 100 μm. ov, otic vesicle; SHF, second heart field; RV, right ventricle; FL, forelimb; DPW, dorsal pericardial wall; oft, outflow tract; mn, motor neurons.
Techniques Used: Expressing, In Situ, Staining, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Genes expressed in the venous pole progenitor cells (pSHF) are upregulated in Chd7 cKO embryos. Maximum intensity projections of whole mount in situ HCR of control and Chd7 cKO embryos for Tbx5 ( A–B’ ), Osr1 ( C–D’ ), Foxf1 ( E–F’ ) and Wnt4 ( G–H’ ). Boxed regions in ( A ), ( B ), ( C ), ( D ), ( E ), ( F ), ( G ), ( H ) are shown in the neighbouring panel. Arrows in ( A’ ) and ( B ’) indicate the expanded expression of Tbx5 in the cKO embryos. n = 4. Scale bars, 100 μm. FL, forelimb; pSHF, posterior second heart field.
Techniques Used: In Situ, Control, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: CHD7 binds cardiac enhancers in CP cells. ( A ) Overlaps between CHD7 CUT&RUN peaks and active and poised cardiac enhancers. Odds ratio (OR) and P -value by Fisher’s test from each stage is presented, with the overlap defined by BEDTools. ( B ) Overlap of CHD7 peaks with enhancers during MES to CP transition, based on their activity. OR and P -value by Fisher’s test is presented. Genome browser snapshots at Isl1 ( C ) and Fgf10 ( D ) loci. Snapshots include tracks from CHD7 peaks (mid blue), ISL1 peaks (purple), CP enhancers from Wamstad et al. (dark blue), H3K4me1 from E10.5 hearts (light blue) and H3K27ac from E10.5 hearts (green). In ( C ), CP enhancers are expanded and their activity at each stage is indicated as absent (−1), poised (0) or active (1). Details on the tracks used can be found in the methods section.
Techniques Used: Activity Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: CHD7 binding sites co-localize with a subset of ISL1-bound sites and are enriched for cardiac TFs. ( A–C ) TF motifs enriched in all CHD7 peaks ( A ) and in CHD7 peaks associated with ‘SHF’ DEGs ( B ) or ‘HEART’ DEGs ( C ), as discovered by HOMER. ( D ) GO:biological processes enriched in CHD7-ISL1 common peaks, ranked by P -values from the Fisher exact test, by Enrichr. ( E ) Distribution of distances from CHD7-ISL1 common peaks to the nearest TSS. ( F ) Top ten transcription factors bound at the promoters of genes associated with CHD7 peaks, based on the ChEA function of Enrichr ( P -value from Fisher exact test). HS, human; MM, mouse. ( G ) Co-immunoprecipitation with ISL1 antibody and western blot analysis for CHD7 (top) or ISL1 (bottom) in day 5 CP cells. 10% of each IP and 2.5% of input was run on 10% SDS-PAGE gel; arrow indicates CHD7 band at ∼340kD.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, SDS Page
Figure Legend Snippet: CHD7—proposed modes of action using Fgf10 enhancer as example. (An extended version of the model presented by Watanabe et al . ) As mentioned above, while CHD7 may participate in recruitment of histone modifiers and splicing the model focuses on its ATPase dependent nucleosome remodelling activity. Depending upon additional specific transcriptional regulators, opening of chromatin could be associated with either up or down regulation, and conversely closure could again be associated with increased or decreased target expression. In the context of the regulation of Fgf10 expression specifically via the intragenic enhancer bound by ISL1 (and TBX1), and its repression via NKX2.5, absence of CHD7 would be predicted to interfere with this balanced control as cells progress from a progenitor to differentiated state.
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Expressing, Control



